The latest cozy interview predicts the unpredictable and confirms that, like the weather, everyone talks about the CBC but no one will ever do anything about it
As Pielkie has laid out, with copious links, the best data we have is the UN IPCC WG1 (data) and the data tracking a dozen variables says that there is nothing detectable outside of natural variation except one, I think heat waves?
But if 11 don’t show a signal it’s just an assumption that the one that does (itself an assumption) is caused by us.
Of course people like Suzuki and the cbc have been lying about it for decades saying it’s already here when the data says no.
Roughly $5 trillion already wasted on nothing, preventing actual progress.
My understanding is that the full IPCC reports predict a subtle change. It is just the synthesis reports that are packed with alarmist rhetoric for the politicians and media.
Very solid points by Stockland. All the CBC had to do was add a couple counterpoints for balance. But, without those small additions, the piece just looks shallow and biased. And public respect for CBC slips down another notch. Unfortunate.
Thanks for this
There is no climate emergency.
As Pielkie has laid out, with copious links, the best data we have is the UN IPCC WG1 (data) and the data tracking a dozen variables says that there is nothing detectable outside of natural variation except one, I think heat waves?
But if 11 don’t show a signal it’s just an assumption that the one that does (itself an assumption) is caused by us.
Of course people like Suzuki and the cbc have been lying about it for decades saying it’s already here when the data says no.
Roughly $5 trillion already wasted on nothing, preventing actual progress.
Lock them up.
My understanding is that the full IPCC reports predict a subtle change. It is just the synthesis reports that are packed with alarmist rhetoric for the politicians and media.
The CBC pushes an ideology, their viewpoint only.
Skewer, meet Stockland.
Well done, Sir!
Very solid points by Stockland. All the CBC had to do was add a couple counterpoints for balance. But, without those small additions, the piece just looks shallow and biased. And public respect for CBC slips down another notch. Unfortunate.
I don’t believe they got any respect before
So no loss for them