11 Comments
User's avatar
Penny Leifson's avatar

Merry Christmas and Chag urim sameach. Enjoy your grandchildren and the food!

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

I saw that take from Brownsey earlier, i did not realize he was a radical extremist, i will definitely watch him in future, such awful judgement.

Funny how these arguments go.

First its not a problem, then when you cite studies, they say its only a small number of kids (isn't 1 enough?), then they switch to why do you care so much (why are you REALLY protesting this, are you transphobic?) Shouldn't we all protect kinds whether we have our own or not? I have 2.

My issue with this is that we know pregnant women are supposed to avoid a list of substances to avoid damaging the fetus starting with alcohol. We now say that kids up to 21 (nenshi mentioned 25) shouldn't touch THC or other drugs as it interrupts development and leaves kids with severe mental problems for the rest of their lives.

But drugs that are designed to interrupt development are somehow A-ok?

When i ask that simple question i get a rerun of the above argument cycle.

The streets of our cities are littered with the results of our recent experiment with drugs for all, should we make it worse?

And since we are heading into cancellation territory anyway, the NIH classifies drag queens as a male sexual fetish, they get excited dressing as women. Fine, whatever. Adult are free to go to drag shows if that floats their boat.

But why do people insist on exposing little kids to a male sexual fetish?

What does society gain from that?

Never an answer to that question either.

Merry Christmas

Expand full comment
steven lightfoot's avatar

The CNN (He/Him) thing is priceless.

The Canadian MSM is pathetic, just more proof in their ignoring of The Cass Report etc. A pox on all their houses.

Expand full comment
Gavin Bamber's avatar

Trudeau is underbrained.

Expand full comment
S.McRobbie's avatar

So Sajjan eventually did the right thing. Maybe there was an adult in the room after all.

Why is a Crown Corporation using tickets to garner favour with an elected official? We don't use the word corruption enough in this country.

Expand full comment
Merlin M's avatar

I’d like to think so but doing the right thing after exposure does somewhat tarnish the result. Also giving to a worthy charity is a great gesture but doesn’t absolve the act of acceptance of the freebie in the first place according to the written rules.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

Yes, they were caught this time, that is the only difference here.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

Oh, and another $500mil for the CBC? Trudeau would have to have a death wish.

And why would the CBC ask for that now with Poilievre coming in, that is just fuel on the fire for him and the CPC regarding that useless moneypit.

Extremely bad tactical move, strengthen Poilievre's argument right at the moment you should be sucking up.

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

Not if it is for one last round of performance-unrelated (or whatever they called it) extra pay.

Expand full comment
Akshay's avatar

Fact check outlets stating that the CNN image showing the pronouns is altered. I am all for hanging the mainstream media to dry for their wokism, but let's just acknowledge that CNN image was not true. Maybe just remove that section.

Expand full comment
Peter Menzies's avatar

I will keep an eye on Reuters Fact Check for that one.

Expand full comment