I remember hearing Marx Carnage complaining not long before coming back to save Canada, that the only problem with Trudeau’s carbon tax was that it wasn’t high enough to do the job. Now, either that was some kind of auditory hallucination, or he’s gaslighting us.
Was I just not paying attention before Carney, or did he invent the “consumer carbon tax”. I don’t ever remember seeing it phrased that way. It was always positioned as just the carbon tax. Is this the opening to more game playing?
It's all about power for the "right" people, the "right" ideologies and the "right" way of thinking. Conservatives are just not the right people. They are mistrusted by Bay ST to your average real estate broker to U of T gender studies prof. All make their bones by globalism and progressism. The media is just one part of message control. Teachers unions, liberal premiers from Doug Ford to David Eby to the ads you see on YouTube/ It's all marrative. Wake me when the election is over because the elites will win and the little guy and even the private sector middle class will continue getting crushed in managed decline. The centre-left all over the West is the machine that is facilitating it and radical environmentalism is the excuse.
True. Western seperation or Quebecois seperation? I think we are entering into a very difficult period for our country regardless of who wins. Though I would be very glad for a change of government.
Well said. We are heading to a reelection of a socialist fiscally irresponsible government run by wealthy elites which will continue to bury our country and the middle class..sad ,very sad
It's so unfair to Poilievre to think that so many Canadians will vote for Carney without remembering what has come out of his mouth at different times.
I’m glad to see your summation of coverage by Global. I thought I may be imagining it after repeated incidents of them outdoing the CBC (and CTV) as LPC cheerleaders. I definitely didn’t see that coming which is likely why it took my age-addled brain a while to notice the difference.
A law making it a criminal offense for an elected official to refuse to answer a question would go a long way to increasing news readership. Repurpose the CBC to be a repository for all public institutions. All must file at least quarterly reports on the state of their department, administration etc. all elected reps at all levels must make themselves available to the press minimum once per quarter. Fines and jail time for those who ignore the citizens they serve…
I will just say this. There are consequences to repeatedly crapping on the very individuals you need to carry your message to the general public. The general public doesn’t follow you closely enough. Only your diehards do and you already have their vote.
Excluding the press from your plane is a dumb move for the same reason. Want to know why most of the stories are about Carney? The press is with him 24/7.
Mark Carney was Trudeau's advisor during the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC which enabled the elimination of hundreds of thousands of Canadians from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus, ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits while simultaneously injecting Canadians with nanotechnology biosensors for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This was de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM using MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY which enabled the biggest transfer (theft) of wealth in human history. Why are BOTH Left and Right garbage media silent about the Covid-19 DISASTER CAPITALISM which bankrupted, maimed and murdered Canadians during an election campaign?
Arrest Mark Carney for his Covid-19 treason, racketeering, extortion, genetic-editing, warrantless search and seizure, extortion, premeditated murder and crimes against humanity.
There is something to be said about the media coverage. I’ll get back to that. First the more salient element.
Menzies builds his case on exaggerated premises. First, he sets up a straw man by claiming the carbon tax was sold as the only path to climate salvation. It wasn’t. It was widely presented as one of the most efficient, fair, and evidence-based tools available—not a silver bullet.
Second, he miscasts Carney’s acknowledgment of rollback as deception. In reality, Carney did the only thing practical under current legislative constraints and given the unpopularity of the tax (unquestionably Poilievre’s most substantial achievement in life). If future governments reverse course, they’ll face the same hurdles whether it’s being brought back through new legislation or under the current legislation. Either way, the implication that this was a secret bait-and-switch collapses under scrutiny. There was symbolism applied to the only step he could reasonably take that, if nothing else, does the most practical to ensure it could never be brought back.
Finally, the most glaring issue is the framing of Poilievre as a truth-teller denied credit. In fact, his rhetoric was rooted in populist oversimplification: blaming carbon pricing for inflation while ignoring overwhelming evidence that other forces were far more significant. He also neglected the economic reality that carbon emissions carry enormous future costs. Pricing them now is not radical—it’s economically sound and aligned with Canada’s international commitments and electoral promises.
So, yes, the media mostly misses the role that Poilievre played in all this. However, it was in no way a positive role. Through deception and repetition (making the lie into truth) he was able to influence public opinion and ensure that voters would not accept the necessary increase in the carbon tax. I include this article among that mess that is either ignoring the real problem or (in this case) turning the villain into the hero of the story.
There is something to be said about the media coverage. I’ll get back to that. First the more salient element.
Menzies builds his case on exaggerated premises. First, he sets up a straw man by claiming the carbon tax was sold as the only path to climate salvation. It wasn’t. It was widely presented as one of the most efficient, fair, and evidence-based tools available—not a silver bullet.
Second, he miscasts Carney’s acknowledgment of rollback as deception. In reality, Carney did the only thing practical under current legislative constraints and given the unpopularity of the tax (unquestionably Poilievre’s most substantial achievement in life). If future governments reverse course, they’ll face the same hurdles whether it’s being brought back through new legislation or under the current legislation. Either way, the implication that this was a secret bait-and-switch collapses under scrutiny. There was symbolism applied to the only step he could reasonably take that, if nothing else, does the most practical to ensure it could never be brought back.
Finally, the most glaring issue is the framing of Poilievre as a truth-teller denied credit. In fact, his rhetoric was rooted in populist oversimplification: blaming carbon pricing for inflation while ignoring overwhelming evidence that other forces were far more significant. He also neglected the economic reality that carbon emissions carry enormous future costs. Pricing them now is not radical—it’s economically sound and aligned with Canada’s international commitments and electoral promises.
So, yes, the media mostly misses the role that Poilievre played in all this. However, it was in no way a positive role. Through deception and repetition (making the lie into truth) he was able to influence public opinion and ensure that voters would not accept the necessary increase in the carbon tax. I include this article among that mess that is either ignoring the real problem or (in this case) turning the villain into the hero of the story.
I remember hearing Marx Carnage complaining not long before coming back to save Canada, that the only problem with Trudeau’s carbon tax was that it wasn’t high enough to do the job. Now, either that was some kind of auditory hallucination, or he’s gaslighting us.
Here is the truth about Mark Carney's greenwashing Sustainable Development Goals.
https://odysee.com/@RisingTideFoundation:b/escaping-calypso's-island-ep.03-energy:c
"...or the guy who, as he appears prone to do, took credit for other people’s efforts: Carney?" Ouch!
Was I just not paying attention before Carney, or did he invent the “consumer carbon tax”. I don’t ever remember seeing it phrased that way. It was always positioned as just the carbon tax. Is this the opening to more game playing?
You bet your sweet bippy it is!
Narrative is all.
All about $$
It's all about power for the "right" people, the "right" ideologies and the "right" way of thinking. Conservatives are just not the right people. They are mistrusted by Bay ST to your average real estate broker to U of T gender studies prof. All make their bones by globalism and progressism. The media is just one part of message control. Teachers unions, liberal premiers from Doug Ford to David Eby to the ads you see on YouTube/ It's all marrative. Wake me when the election is over because the elites will win and the little guy and even the private sector middle class will continue getting crushed in managed decline. The centre-left all over the West is the machine that is facilitating it and radical environmentalism is the excuse.
There are actual choices fhis election.
Carney represents an acceleration of the last decade of bad policy.
He has the Century Initiative guy on his team FFS.
True. Western seperation or Quebecois seperation? I think we are entering into a very difficult period for our country regardless of who wins. Though I would be very glad for a change of government.
Well said. We are heading to a reelection of a socialist fiscally irresponsible government run by wealthy elites which will continue to bury our country and the middle class..sad ,very sad
It's so unfair to Poilievre to think that so many Canadians will vote for Carney without remembering what has come out of his mouth at different times.
I’m glad to see your summation of coverage by Global. I thought I may be imagining it after repeated incidents of them outdoing the CBC (and CTV) as LPC cheerleaders. I definitely didn’t see that coming which is likely why it took my age-addled brain a while to notice the difference.
The tax payer funded media boot licking will continue until morale improves.
A law making it a criminal offense for an elected official to refuse to answer a question would go a long way to increasing news readership. Repurpose the CBC to be a repository for all public institutions. All must file at least quarterly reports on the state of their department, administration etc. all elected reps at all levels must make themselves available to the press minimum once per quarter. Fines and jail time for those who ignore the citizens they serve…
Out out damn spot
I will just say this. There are consequences to repeatedly crapping on the very individuals you need to carry your message to the general public. The general public doesn’t follow you closely enough. Only your diehards do and you already have their vote.
Excluding the press from your plane is a dumb move for the same reason. Want to know why most of the stories are about Carney? The press is with him 24/7.
I really don’t know who is advising PP.
Mark Carney was Trudeau's advisor during the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC which enabled the elimination of hundreds of thousands of Canadians from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus, ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits while simultaneously injecting Canadians with nanotechnology biosensors for surveillance under the skin via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. This was de facto DISASTER CAPITALISM using MKULTRA SHOCK THERAPY which enabled the biggest transfer (theft) of wealth in human history. Why are BOTH Left and Right garbage media silent about the Covid-19 DISASTER CAPITALISM which bankrupted, maimed and murdered Canadians during an election campaign?
Arrest Mark Carney for his Covid-19 treason, racketeering, extortion, genetic-editing, warrantless search and seizure, extortion, premeditated murder and crimes against humanity.
https://thenationaltelegraph.com/national/canadian-crown-corporations-coerced-employees-with-fake-vaccine-mandate/
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/did-the-c19-vaccine-kill-17-million
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-docs-from-2002-reveal-20-year-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotechnology/
https://rumble.com/v6ishsj-394359571.html
https://horizons.service.canada.ca/en/2020/02/11/exploring-biodigital-convergence/index.shtml
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
There is something to be said about the media coverage. I’ll get back to that. First the more salient element.
Menzies builds his case on exaggerated premises. First, he sets up a straw man by claiming the carbon tax was sold as the only path to climate salvation. It wasn’t. It was widely presented as one of the most efficient, fair, and evidence-based tools available—not a silver bullet.
Second, he miscasts Carney’s acknowledgment of rollback as deception. In reality, Carney did the only thing practical under current legislative constraints and given the unpopularity of the tax (unquestionably Poilievre’s most substantial achievement in life). If future governments reverse course, they’ll face the same hurdles whether it’s being brought back through new legislation or under the current legislation. Either way, the implication that this was a secret bait-and-switch collapses under scrutiny. There was symbolism applied to the only step he could reasonably take that, if nothing else, does the most practical to ensure it could never be brought back.
Finally, the most glaring issue is the framing of Poilievre as a truth-teller denied credit. In fact, his rhetoric was rooted in populist oversimplification: blaming carbon pricing for inflation while ignoring overwhelming evidence that other forces were far more significant. He also neglected the economic reality that carbon emissions carry enormous future costs. Pricing them now is not radical—it’s economically sound and aligned with Canada’s international commitments and electoral promises.
So, yes, the media mostly misses the role that Poilievre played in all this. However, it was in no way a positive role. Through deception and repetition (making the lie into truth) he was able to influence public opinion and ensure that voters would not accept the necessary increase in the carbon tax. I include this article among that mess that is either ignoring the real problem or (in this case) turning the villain into the hero of the story.
🤔😴
There is something to be said about the media coverage. I’ll get back to that. First the more salient element.
Menzies builds his case on exaggerated premises. First, he sets up a straw man by claiming the carbon tax was sold as the only path to climate salvation. It wasn’t. It was widely presented as one of the most efficient, fair, and evidence-based tools available—not a silver bullet.
Second, he miscasts Carney’s acknowledgment of rollback as deception. In reality, Carney did the only thing practical under current legislative constraints and given the unpopularity of the tax (unquestionably Poilievre’s most substantial achievement in life). If future governments reverse course, they’ll face the same hurdles whether it’s being brought back through new legislation or under the current legislation. Either way, the implication that this was a secret bait-and-switch collapses under scrutiny. There was symbolism applied to the only step he could reasonably take that, if nothing else, does the most practical to ensure it could never be brought back.
Finally, the most glaring issue is the framing of Poilievre as a truth-teller denied credit. In fact, his rhetoric was rooted in populist oversimplification: blaming carbon pricing for inflation while ignoring overwhelming evidence that other forces were far more significant. He also neglected the economic reality that carbon emissions carry enormous future costs. Pricing them now is not radical—it’s economically sound and aligned with Canada’s international commitments and electoral promises.
So, yes, the media mostly misses the role that Poilievre played in all this. However, it was in no way a positive role. Through deception and repetition (making the lie into truth) he was able to influence public opinion and ensure that voters would not accept the necessary increase in the carbon tax. I include this article among that mess that is either ignoring the real problem or (in this case) turning the villain into the hero of the story.