“I wanted journalists to get answers to these questions but they never did. I don’t expect they ever will, but surely the public has a right to know.” Journalists no longer ask questions. They parrot the narrative talking points. Period. Embarrassing
And I doubt that any federal leadership debates will be monitored by someone like Ezra Levant - I expect that we will have folks like Rosemary Barton asking tough 'sock' questions.
And now we have seen Carney asked minimally tough questions and he reacted exactly like we would expect an elitist snob to do, exasperated at even having to listen to questions.
Why did you indicate you needed EMERGENCY POWERS to addresses tarriffs.
Do you envision they will be used for a short duration? For what purpose? Is it bill c293 (the perpetual globalist emergency act - with no off boarding to deal with anything that could in the future cause any risk of a pandemic . None of which is defined and could include climate )
Would the Declaration of emergency include stopping elections?
Will you seek an immediate general election to affirm your mandate? Which is what?
Retail carbon tax is what. What are you doing with the carbon tax?
What is your view on the UN MIGRATION COMPACT which requires steady uninterrupted migration where migrants are fed housed jobbed as part of the 189 page commitment.see also the IOM. Migration is a globalist post nation state agenda. Immigration is a nation state policy.
What is your view on the budget and debt and financing debt.
Are you following more biodigital convergence ( see horizons canada)?
What about CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY...I mean you are oddly in place as a central banker, aligned to complete this agenda. See cbdc trackers. Will cbdc work with c40.org and Globalcovenantofmayors.org view to social credit carbon allotments to municipalitiesand then to individualsto measure their carbon footprint. You are oddly placed as a globalist, central banker, with a history (and ditto for spouse) alarmist radical climate
Agenda. In my view we are in the room with an evil people don't have the conversation yet to manoevre
I have so many more. I'll never get entrance to any of his events.
Amazing questions. As the craft of journalism has been demolished by a new class of narrative writers and activists, is it time for us to take back the term journalist? Progressives are very good at co-opting the language to serve their aims. It’s well past time that we reinvigorate and up the stakes on what can be called journalism. We don’t have many Menzies left to ask the important questions.
"I wanted journalists to get answers to these questions but they never did."
Did journalists even try to get these answers? I know Carney avoided questions from Canadian journalists, but when they got to ask questions it always seemed like more of the same type of questions we always get from Canadian journalists to Liberal politicians ... "Pierre Poilievre is so awful and is going to wreck this country, what are you going to to do to stop him?".
The Liberals and their friends in the media have gotten their wish with a lightly vetted candidate to replace Trudeau and carry on with the Liberal plan to destroy the country to save it. I guess we will see if Canadians are stupid enough to fall for it.
My hope is the light vetting of Carney will work out exactly as it did for Harris in the USA. The purpose of a leadership run (or American primary) is to expose bad candidates and give good candidates exposure to hone their ideas and delivery.
The fact that Carney is exciting as toothpaste is what makes me think there won’t be a quick election but on the assumption that can’t polish horse droppings they likely go to election fast as the only positive they have is running against Trump and that could go away in a moment.
I have one, when is he going to face an election so as to gain a seat in the House of Commons and actually assume the role of Prime Minister. Because until then he is relegated to the Visitors Gallery and not able to promote to governments agenda or face questions from the opposition parties.
My pet peeve seems to be overshadowed by the poor journalism we suffer from. Canada is being seriously hampered by this bilingualism nonsense. The talent pool is sickeningly shallow and we all pay the price. Add the DEI crap and it becomes sadly laughable
Anyone who is ok with this process has not thought it through.
Additional questions:
Why have you not reported all your financial positions and conflicts of interests?
How can the PM be an unelected private citizen who has always expressed loyalties to international or supranational entities and never once even stood for election?
GFANZ falling apart and you bailing on it personally corresponds to the American government looking closer at your monopolistic and coercive actions, can you comment on that timing?
In industry you have one group build a plant, but you have a completely different group commission it, you need different eyes and different thought processes to catch mistakes. How does putting a career bureaucrat in charge of bureaucrats meet this reality?
The Laurentian Parasite class will not have a woman leader. Especially a minority woman. Time to wake up, females, and use your critical thinking. Stop being fooled by these grifter's.
If Carney continues to only allow journalists from the home team to be allowed to ask these tough questions we will never know what his stance on anything substantial is going to be. That is more Trump Lite than anything Poilievre has tried so far and yet that is the Liberal go-to slur now and likely will be going through the election.
What Carney and the Liberals annd their journalist lackeys are doing is what the Democrats did to shield Biden (for 4 years) and then Harris last fall.
Trump meanwhile sat for interviews with anyone including 3 hours with lifelong democrat Joe Rogan.
Can you even see the bias inherent in your comment?
Obviously not as much as you can. Fox has been the go-to house organ for Trump so fair enough as everyone is allowed a favourite in politics. Keeping any non-cheerleader interviewer away from the mentally fading Biden and underwhelming Harris was just good politics. The issue was that the Liberals constantly paint Poilievre as a Trump clone which they consider the ultimate black mark. With Trump’s vows to absorb Canada this negative view is hardly unique.
Agree with this, but for the leadership race being won for gender reasons. If you’re suggesting that’s part of the mix?
Both leading candidates are cut from similar cloth, sure, but maybe the guy was slightly more removed from the prior regime, in this case, seen as a plus.
Another facet I’d suggest is absent the girl’s CV, global reach.
Mark Carney has some formidable accomplishments attached to his resume, first foreigner at the BOE not least among them, and of the two leading candidates was ultimately least like the last person in charge.
Not a gender question in my mind, and comments suggesting so, only introduces an issue where there is none.
If I was Trump I would post that once again the Liberals had a chance to advance a woman as leader and once again selected the privileged white guy, the ultimate insider.
As payback for the cheap shot Trudeau took at American voters not backing the awful Kamala Harris.
I don't think that Peter was saying that gender was a reason for the libs picking Carney. I don't think the libs were ever going to pick Freeland. They hate her for stabbing Trudeau in the back and starting the whole process.
Why won't you ask Mark Carney about the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC, democide, treason, racketeering and crimes against humanity which he directed?
“I wanted journalists to get answers to these questions but they never did. I don’t expect they ever will, but surely the public has a right to know.” Journalists no longer ask questions. They parrot the narrative talking points. Period. Embarrassing
We have seen narrative control right out in the open thru this process.
There are many “journalists” and “news” organizations that should lose everything.
I have never once seen Carney asked a tough question.
And I doubt that any federal leadership debates will be monitored by someone like Ezra Levant - I expect that we will have folks like Rosemary Barton asking tough 'sock' questions.
And now we have seen Carney asked minimally tough questions and he reacted exactly like we would expect an elitist snob to do, exasperated at even having to listen to questions.
My questions.
Why did you indicate you needed EMERGENCY POWERS to addresses tarriffs.
Do you envision they will be used for a short duration? For what purpose? Is it bill c293 (the perpetual globalist emergency act - with no off boarding to deal with anything that could in the future cause any risk of a pandemic . None of which is defined and could include climate )
Would the Declaration of emergency include stopping elections?
Will you seek an immediate general election to affirm your mandate? Which is what?
Retail carbon tax is what. What are you doing with the carbon tax?
What is your view on the UN MIGRATION COMPACT which requires steady uninterrupted migration where migrants are fed housed jobbed as part of the 189 page commitment.see also the IOM. Migration is a globalist post nation state agenda. Immigration is a nation state policy.
What is your view on the budget and debt and financing debt.
Are you following more biodigital convergence ( see horizons canada)?
What about CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY...I mean you are oddly in place as a central banker, aligned to complete this agenda. See cbdc trackers. Will cbdc work with c40.org and Globalcovenantofmayors.org view to social credit carbon allotments to municipalitiesand then to individualsto measure their carbon footprint. You are oddly placed as a globalist, central banker, with a history (and ditto for spouse) alarmist radical climate
Agenda. In my view we are in the room with an evil people don't have the conversation yet to manoevre
I have so many more. I'll never get entrance to any of his events.
Those are some very thoughtful questions that need to be answered...likely many more as well.
Amazing questions. As the craft of journalism has been demolished by a new class of narrative writers and activists, is it time for us to take back the term journalist? Progressives are very good at co-opting the language to serve their aims. It’s well past time that we reinvigorate and up the stakes on what can be called journalism. We don’t have many Menzies left to ask the important questions.
"I wanted journalists to get answers to these questions but they never did."
Did journalists even try to get these answers? I know Carney avoided questions from Canadian journalists, but when they got to ask questions it always seemed like more of the same type of questions we always get from Canadian journalists to Liberal politicians ... "Pierre Poilievre is so awful and is going to wreck this country, what are you going to to do to stop him?".
The Liberals and their friends in the media have gotten their wish with a lightly vetted candidate to replace Trudeau and carry on with the Liberal plan to destroy the country to save it. I guess we will see if Canadians are stupid enough to fall for it.
My hope is the light vetting of Carney will work out exactly as it did for Harris in the USA. The purpose of a leadership run (or American primary) is to expose bad candidates and give good candidates exposure to hone their ideas and delivery.
The fact that Carney is exciting as toothpaste is what makes me think there won’t be a quick election but on the assumption that can’t polish horse droppings they likely go to election fast as the only positive they have is running against Trump and that could go away in a moment.
The Libs need to go fast as Carney is going to get less popular as every day goes on.
I have one, when is he going to face an election so as to gain a seat in the House of Commons and actually assume the role of Prime Minister. Because until then he is relegated to the Visitors Gallery and not able to promote to governments agenda or face questions from the opposition parties.
Good questions. I’d add why are you claiming that taxing so-called gross polluters won’t harm consumers?
My pet peeve seems to be overshadowed by the poor journalism we suffer from. Canada is being seriously hampered by this bilingualism nonsense. The talent pool is sickeningly shallow and we all pay the price. Add the DEI crap and it becomes sadly laughable
Sadly those questions will likely never be answered.
Anyone who is ok with this process has not thought it through.
Additional questions:
Why have you not reported all your financial positions and conflicts of interests?
How can the PM be an unelected private citizen who has always expressed loyalties to international or supranational entities and never once even stood for election?
GFANZ falling apart and you bailing on it personally corresponds to the American government looking closer at your monopolistic and coercive actions, can you comment on that timing?
In industry you have one group build a plant, but you have a completely different group commission it, you need different eyes and different thought processes to catch mistakes. How does putting a career bureaucrat in charge of bureaucrats meet this reality?
The Laurentian Parasite class will not have a woman leader. Especially a minority woman. Time to wake up, females, and use your critical thinking. Stop being fooled by these grifter's.
If Carney continues to only allow journalists from the home team to be allowed to ask these tough questions we will never know what his stance on anything substantial is going to be. That is more Trump Lite than anything Poilievre has tried so far and yet that is the Liberal go-to slur now and likely will be going through the election.
Why the cheap shot
What Carney and the Liberals annd their journalist lackeys are doing is what the Democrats did to shield Biden (for 4 years) and then Harris last fall.
Trump meanwhile sat for interviews with anyone including 3 hours with lifelong democrat Joe Rogan.
Can you even see the bias inherent in your comment?
Obviously not as much as you can. Fox has been the go-to house organ for Trump so fair enough as everyone is allowed a favourite in politics. Keeping any non-cheerleader interviewer away from the mentally fading Biden and underwhelming Harris was just good politics. The issue was that the Liberals constantly paint Poilievre as a Trump clone which they consider the ultimate black mark. With Trump’s vows to absorb Canada this negative view is hardly unique.
"That reduces the potential pool of qualified applicants to 18 per cent -"
With all the innovation in AI, it's a shame nobody's invented a universal translator yet.
Fck Carney. Off to Europe next week. Because he is “ a European”. Thats elite speak for a self entitled prick.
Agree with this, but for the leadership race being won for gender reasons. If you’re suggesting that’s part of the mix?
Both leading candidates are cut from similar cloth, sure, but maybe the guy was slightly more removed from the prior regime, in this case, seen as a plus.
Another facet I’d suggest is absent the girl’s CV, global reach.
Mark Carney has some formidable accomplishments attached to his resume, first foreigner at the BOE not least among them, and of the two leading candidates was ultimately least like the last person in charge.
Not a gender question in my mind, and comments suggesting so, only introduces an issue where there is none.
If I was Trump I would post that once again the Liberals had a chance to advance a woman as leader and once again selected the privileged white guy, the ultimate insider.
As payback for the cheap shot Trudeau took at American voters not backing the awful Kamala Harris.
Stop the Carnival! 🎪
We have a Winner! 🤡
Could it get more ironic
than Trump yelling DEI?
I don't think that Peter was saying that gender was a reason for the libs picking Carney. I don't think the libs were ever going to pick Freeland. They hate her for stabbing Trudeau in the back and starting the whole process.
I just meant it wasn’t an issue, and mentioned in the post. I would have thought Freeland got kudos for tipping the raft. It was past time.
Why won't you ask Mark Carney about the Covid-19 military operation FAKE PANDEMIC, democide, treason, racketeering and crimes against humanity which he directed?
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/did-the-c19-vaccine-kill-17-million
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/