Grits grabbing Globe and CBC content for attack ads supporting Carney's "positive" campaign while CTV Ottawa drops all pretence of journalism as anything other than a circus sideshow
We are in a broad age of manufactured reality. The actual tensions of globalism vs nationalism is not sufficiently exposed. Above is a post about the WHO Pandemic Treaty. I don't think anyone has covered it, in depth or otherwise, and certainly no one in government paid media. The omission is more important than the news they do cover.
Bill C293 is an area I extensively researched. The liberal and NDP voted for expropriation of land, for elimination of meat agriculture (phasing out live animal markets) and for carte blanch authority through the WHO on the entire governance of Canada and setting up a permanent emergency act. No serious reporting ever reviewed that act, the consequences to Canada. Here is one of my podcasts on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m5iz3MtW30
When Carney says he wants Emergency Powers to run Canada to put through green or energy people ought to look what Bill 293 was and represents. It was at the senate 2nd reading.
Who understands National Focal Points and how they work. Emergency powers to a Prime Minister? That should frighten every voter in the nation. Yet that seems to have skated by.
Who is looking and Programmable Digital Currency which Christine Laguarde has proposed for the EU by October 25, 2025. What is a Central Banker good for if not imposing this?
How about speech and the idea of speech committees through the work place, professional bodies deciding almost universally to side along global v national lines. Big disease Big Climate Big Gender and the global governances are the things you cannot discuss yet are moving top down, globally with governing structures. Yet none of the changes are examined comprehensively.
the structure of the pandemic treaty, bill c293, and c40 all have the same themes: 0kg of meat or dairy (yes); mandatory de-growth and total control of countries, and populations,
Immigration is a massive hot topic. Yet no one found the IOM or the UN Migration Compact which requires steady unending migration into oecd countries where migrants are provided housing food and jobs and digital biometric id.
I determined that most things we are observing and at issue can be sourced through examination of the tension of globalism v nationalism. Yet where is that examination in the media or of Carney? We are in a structuralized take-over by globalist power structures embedded through national focal points of either the UN or the WHO.
If I found all this just with an innate curiosity looking at legislation and treaties and bilateral and multilateral agreements and NGO activities then how come media hasn't shown any interest.
What about that changes to municipalities are coming in at speed that set up a smart city, a cognitive city and utilize the bills passed like c11 and c18
The press does talk. it seems the crises are what they discuss. But what they miss means we have a population that is massively illiterate on globalism and how to parse our world.
There is just such a phenomenal amount of changes to power, to governance, to how we will live that is being structured within legislation that never gets a real examination.
So we have a very funded media dancing the topics along, and filing our lives with non-analysis.
I am an "influencer" possibly on the Right. My hope for the right and conservatism is that within it are the people aware of these tensions and understand the threat a global totalitarian state that approaches China (hey what about Carney and the digital yuan and his funding of Brookfield through the ccp bank). Social credit is not easily wrestled off. It comes with digital programmable currency and digital id and a bloated state set up through known online and known in the real world (smart city).
Unless we have a population educated in what the consequences of globalism, how can we evaluate what Carney represents or possibly push back on elements that are dangerous for auto determination.
Every leader that is a threat to the globalist vision for humanity is attacked by media and through power structures that side-check them.
The soft glove treatment to a man dropped into Canada and who helped generate the decade of decline we are witnessing is appalling.
Excellent comment but the fake 2-party paradigm is what keeps the masses from seeing this globalist totalitarian coup détat.
Conservative governments aided and abetted Covid-19 crimes against humanity which is why the overwhelming majority of conservatives are also "vaccinated" with the mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections which change gene expression and contain nanotechnology biosensors which connect us to the Internet of Bio-Nano Things contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. These are crimes of warrantless search and seizure.
Data is the new oil and the blockchain bioeconomy runs on biometric data tracking, crypto currencies (public and private), behavioral nudging, social credit scores and HUMAN IMPACT BOND MARKETS from which Mark Carney's Brookfield Impact Investments stands to profoundly benefit.
Peter, thank you for your thought-provoking and timely commentary. Your article highlights the tension between journalism and political influence during this election season, and I appreciate your candid, balanced approach.
You shed light on the challenges media organizations face when they rely on government funding while trying to maintain editorial independence. The example of the Globe’s dual pieces—one potentially damaging to Poilievre and the other casting Carney in a flattering light—illustrates how easily timing and tone can be perceived as partisan, especially during such a critical time. Your coverage of Carson Jerema’s response added valuable perspective, showing that internal media debate is alive and well and that accountability within journalism is still possible.
Your remarks on Rachel Gilmore’s new role at CTV Ottawa were also humorous and insightful. It’s clear that media outlets are wrestling with connecting with younger audiences, but as you point out, that shouldn't come at the cost of journalistic integrity. Your Stealers Wheel reference brought a smile—perfectly capturing the current media circus.
In a climate where polarization can cloud facts and optics matter more than substance, your article offers a necessary call for critical thinking and transparency. Even if readers may differ politically, your voice reminds us that the media’s role is too important to be reduced to campaign fuel or clickbait content.
Thanks again for continuing to speak with clarity and courage.
We are in the middle of an election campaign. Why isn't this front page news? Because both sides of the fake 2-party paradigm are manufactured and censored.
Canada has North Korean levels of propaganda. I carefully manage my media hygiene. Problem is most Canadians don’t and would gladly poison themselves if it meant they were told they were a good person and were doing their part etc etc etc. 🙄🙄🙄
I also saw the Rachel Bubble person giving a similar defence of the tax havens.
It's true that investments shielded from tax can grow quicker than those that are not. However, the government services provided to us are paid through taxes, and avoidance of the taxes while still enjoying government services is freeloading.
The government DID give us the opportunity to defer taxes on SOME of our income. It's call an RRSP, and there are limits to our contributions to it. People who use tax havens are circumventing these limits.
Maybe a real journalist could re-phrase the question to Mr. Carney highlighting the 'freeloading' aspect of his tax havens.
Hi Peter, while you cite some good examples, you have seemingly overlooked or ignored a lot if media that tilts the other way. It makes it seem like you want to present a single side of the story as opposed to examining it in great detail. When Rebel media is selling merchandise on their website that picks a side (Trump) what are we to make of this? If consumers are getting so much of their information from other sources besides TV and radio, how can we rely on YouTube or podcasts? The broader point you are making is that media is biased by their sources of revenue. Was that the case for you as an editor? Should all media not turn disclose all their funding?
I think its fair to say most media work to avoid undermining their own interests. When it came to advertising revenue being at risk, that short term risk was always balanced against the longer term need to maintain public trust. As for transparency, all people had to do was turn the pages. Maintenance of public trust is vital.
"... Sisyphean task ... Just how big IS that stone / boulder?
Thank you, Sir, for demonstrating to all of we plebes that our patrician worsers in the LPC cannot be trusted with something as trivial as truth, non-bias, independence or, even, basic news.
We plebes certainly DON'T know our "place" and, quite honestly, we are just uppity. Of course, our worsers will insist on putting us in our "place" if they win so that they can then define for us for all time "truth." In green print, the funds required to purchase said ink will be borrowed, of course.
Remember we are not an Empire. Many countries have come and gone Many Empires have come and gone. From the Mongols to the Alexander the Great, Ottomans, British. You Dear Mary have a front row seat at watching an empire die. I doubt very much that we will both be alive to see the end. But at least if you have grandkids, you can tell them that you actually witnessed the beginning of the end of an empire.
Listening to your latest Full Press podcast, I'm impressed by a fact that the discussers didn't seem to find unusual. The CBC reporter asked a tough question to a member of The Approved Party. Worse, she asked a tough question about banking to a banker. No mainstream US reporter (NBC, CBS,ABC, NPR) would EVER ask a tough question to a Democrat or a financier. Fox always asks fake tough-sounding questions to Democrats but never any serious questions about the Holy Stock Market.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/reject-the-treaty
We are in a broad age of manufactured reality. The actual tensions of globalism vs nationalism is not sufficiently exposed. Above is a post about the WHO Pandemic Treaty. I don't think anyone has covered it, in depth or otherwise, and certainly no one in government paid media. The omission is more important than the news they do cover.
Bill C293 is an area I extensively researched. The liberal and NDP voted for expropriation of land, for elimination of meat agriculture (phasing out live animal markets) and for carte blanch authority through the WHO on the entire governance of Canada and setting up a permanent emergency act. No serious reporting ever reviewed that act, the consequences to Canada. Here is one of my podcasts on it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m5iz3MtW30
When Carney says he wants Emergency Powers to run Canada to put through green or energy people ought to look what Bill 293 was and represents. It was at the senate 2nd reading.
Who understands National Focal Points and how they work. Emergency powers to a Prime Minister? That should frighten every voter in the nation. Yet that seems to have skated by.
Who is looking and Programmable Digital Currency which Christine Laguarde has proposed for the EU by October 25, 2025. What is a Central Banker good for if not imposing this?
How about speech and the idea of speech committees through the work place, professional bodies deciding almost universally to side along global v national lines. Big disease Big Climate Big Gender and the global governances are the things you cannot discuss yet are moving top down, globally with governing structures. Yet none of the changes are examined comprehensively.
globalcovenantofmayors.org
Here is a dissection of c40 cities I did using Toronto as an example.
https://rumble.com/v2yhak4-climate-crisis-curtailing-your-freedoms-c40-smart-15-minute-cities.html
the structure of the pandemic treaty, bill c293, and c40 all have the same themes: 0kg of meat or dairy (yes); mandatory de-growth and total control of countries, and populations,
Immigration is a massive hot topic. Yet no one found the IOM or the UN Migration Compact which requires steady unending migration into oecd countries where migrants are provided housing food and jobs and digital biometric id.
I determined that most things we are observing and at issue can be sourced through examination of the tension of globalism v nationalism. Yet where is that examination in the media or of Carney? We are in a structuralized take-over by globalist power structures embedded through national focal points of either the UN or the WHO.
If I found all this just with an innate curiosity looking at legislation and treaties and bilateral and multilateral agreements and NGO activities then how come media hasn't shown any interest.
What about that changes to municipalities are coming in at speed that set up a smart city, a cognitive city and utilize the bills passed like c11 and c18
The press does talk. it seems the crises are what they discuss. But what they miss means we have a population that is massively illiterate on globalism and how to parse our world.
There is just such a phenomenal amount of changes to power, to governance, to how we will live that is being structured within legislation that never gets a real examination.
So we have a very funded media dancing the topics along, and filing our lives with non-analysis.
I am an "influencer" possibly on the Right. My hope for the right and conservatism is that within it are the people aware of these tensions and understand the threat a global totalitarian state that approaches China (hey what about Carney and the digital yuan and his funding of Brookfield through the ccp bank). Social credit is not easily wrestled off. It comes with digital programmable currency and digital id and a bloated state set up through known online and known in the real world (smart city).
Unless we have a population educated in what the consequences of globalism, how can we evaluate what Carney represents or possibly push back on elements that are dangerous for auto determination.
Every leader that is a threat to the globalist vision for humanity is attacked by media and through power structures that side-check them.
The soft glove treatment to a man dropped into Canada and who helped generate the decade of decline we are witnessing is appalling.
Excellent comment but the fake 2-party paradigm is what keeps the masses from seeing this globalist totalitarian coup détat.
Conservative governments aided and abetted Covid-19 crimes against humanity which is why the overwhelming majority of conservatives are also "vaccinated" with the mRNA Gene Therapy platform injections which change gene expression and contain nanotechnology biosensors which connect us to the Internet of Bio-Nano Things contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada. These are crimes of warrantless search and seizure.
Data is the new oil and the blockchain bioeconomy runs on biometric data tracking, crypto currencies (public and private), behavioral nudging, social credit scores and HUMAN IMPACT BOND MARKETS from which Mark Carney's Brookfield Impact Investments stands to profoundly benefit.
https://www.brookfield.com/news-insights/insights/brookfield-named-worlds-largest-impact-investor
https://wrenchinthegears.com/2020/10/27/who-voted-in-davos-how-data-driven-government-and-the-internet-of-bodies-are-poised-to-transform-smart-sustainable-cities-into-social-impact-prisons/
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11/investigative-reports/un-backed-banker-alliance-announces-green-plan-to-transform-the-global-financial-system/
https://financialpost.com/fp-finance/ottawa-to-remove-investment-cap-for-canadian-pension-funds
https://thenationaltelegraph.com/national/canadian-crown-corporations-coerced-employees-with-fake-vaccine-mandate/
https://rumble.com/v6ishsj-394359571.html
https://odysee.com/@Argusfest:b/Alison_Nano:e
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/government-docs-from-2002-reveal-20-year-plan-to-alter-evolution-with-nanotechnology/
Peter, thank you for your thought-provoking and timely commentary. Your article highlights the tension between journalism and political influence during this election season, and I appreciate your candid, balanced approach.
You shed light on the challenges media organizations face when they rely on government funding while trying to maintain editorial independence. The example of the Globe’s dual pieces—one potentially damaging to Poilievre and the other casting Carney in a flattering light—illustrates how easily timing and tone can be perceived as partisan, especially during such a critical time. Your coverage of Carson Jerema’s response added valuable perspective, showing that internal media debate is alive and well and that accountability within journalism is still possible.
Your remarks on Rachel Gilmore’s new role at CTV Ottawa were also humorous and insightful. It’s clear that media outlets are wrestling with connecting with younger audiences, but as you point out, that shouldn't come at the cost of journalistic integrity. Your Stealers Wheel reference brought a smile—perfectly capturing the current media circus.
In a climate where polarization can cloud facts and optics matter more than substance, your article offers a necessary call for critical thinking and transparency. Even if readers may differ politically, your voice reminds us that the media’s role is too important to be reduced to campaign fuel or clickbait content.
Thanks again for continuing to speak with clarity and courage.
Very kind of you (blush)
We are in the middle of an election campaign. Why isn't this front page news? Because both sides of the fake 2-party paradigm are manufactured and censored.
https://breachmedia.ca/hypocritical-pierre-poilievre-slammed-illegal-border-crossers-relative-crossed-conservatives/
Remember “it’s not over until the fat Ontario premier sings.”
Canada has North Korean levels of propaganda. I carefully manage my media hygiene. Problem is most Canadians don’t and would gladly poison themselves if it meant they were told they were a good person and were doing their part etc etc etc. 🙄🙄🙄
Re: the justification of tax havens:
I also saw the Rachel Bubble person giving a similar defence of the tax havens.
It's true that investments shielded from tax can grow quicker than those that are not. However, the government services provided to us are paid through taxes, and avoidance of the taxes while still enjoying government services is freeloading.
The government DID give us the opportunity to defer taxes on SOME of our income. It's call an RRSP, and there are limits to our contributions to it. People who use tax havens are circumventing these limits.
Maybe a real journalist could re-phrase the question to Mr. Carney highlighting the 'freeloading' aspect of his tax havens.
Hi Peter, while you cite some good examples, you have seemingly overlooked or ignored a lot if media that tilts the other way. It makes it seem like you want to present a single side of the story as opposed to examining it in great detail. When Rebel media is selling merchandise on their website that picks a side (Trump) what are we to make of this? If consumers are getting so much of their information from other sources besides TV and radio, how can we rely on YouTube or podcasts? The broader point you are making is that media is biased by their sources of revenue. Was that the case for you as an editor? Should all media not turn disclose all their funding?
I think its fair to say most media work to avoid undermining their own interests. When it came to advertising revenue being at risk, that short term risk was always balanced against the longer term need to maintain public trust. As for transparency, all people had to do was turn the pages. Maintenance of public trust is vital.
Thanks Peter. Canadian journalism has become a pathetic circus indeed. Another JT accomplishment.
What is pathetic is you actually thinking that the former manchild priminister actually has anything to do with the media in this country.
Every single major newspaper is owned by Americans.
The dude gave your money (and mine) to them. He bought their loyalty. If you can't see it, that's not my problem.
And you cant see that they write what they are told to? That's not your problem, it is a problem, everyone in Canadas problem.
"... Sisyphean task ... Just how big IS that stone / boulder?
Thank you, Sir, for demonstrating to all of we plebes that our patrician worsers in the LPC cannot be trusted with something as trivial as truth, non-bias, independence or, even, basic news.
We plebes certainly DON'T know our "place" and, quite honestly, we are just uppity. Of course, our worsers will insist on putting us in our "place" if they win so that they can then define for us for all time "truth." In green print, the funds required to purchase said ink will be borrowed, of course.
Cant wait for it to be over!
Do you mean the election or the country. Both seem to be happening pretty quickly.
Remember we are not an Empire. Many countries have come and gone Many Empires have come and gone. From the Mongols to the Alexander the Great, Ottomans, British. You Dear Mary have a front row seat at watching an empire die. I doubt very much that we will both be alive to see the end. But at least if you have grandkids, you can tell them that you actually witnessed the beginning of the end of an empire.
Listening to your latest Full Press podcast, I'm impressed by a fact that the discussers didn't seem to find unusual. The CBC reporter asked a tough question to a member of The Approved Party. Worse, she asked a tough question about banking to a banker. No mainstream US reporter (NBC, CBS,ABC, NPR) would EVER ask a tough question to a Democrat or a financier. Fox always asks fake tough-sounding questions to Democrats but never any serious questions about the Holy Stock Market.