41 Comments
User's avatar
McExpat's avatar

Regardless of how Carney got to where he is, and anyone with a brain is raising eyebrows. There is just too much incestuousness between the Eurasia group and Liberal insiders and others forced out, that the play has been highly coordinated.

The bigger issue will be the lack of vigour covering him. So far, I am finding his affect and disposition in front of the media really poor. I’m actually quite surprised how weak he really is and it doesn’t take long for the mask to come off. He’s not charismatic and has zero authenticity. This matters right now a lot. This is a man used to getting his own way in a board room, not with voters. Going forward the Liberals will put the pedal to the floor on the emergency aspect, stoking a huge fear reaction, and keeping Carney far from the media. They are hoping the abbreviated election will outrun the inevitable realization Carney is hugely problematic as a candidate.

We are just out of the gate, the polls are akin to throwing dice at this stage.

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Great questions. I'm told by an attendee of a launch of a restaurant in Toronto owned by liberal insiders, that the sea parts in the crowd when Butts showed up. Every who's who entered without anything more than casual notice. But Butt showed up and it was just shy of genuflection, nose to ground, and the sprinkling of rose petals.

My friend was told, "that's who runs the country. "

My friend had never seen anything like the control and obvious intimidation of Butts over the liberals.

That angle needs more exploration.

No questions about how two quasifamily members can be the top runners in the race. Karl Marx Carney is the God father to Freedland's son. Maybe it always was a charade.

Then why does no one ever touch the horrific swath of WEF through our Parliament, and whether the loyalty Singh showed to the liberals was an engineered loyalty of the wef. The goals of the wef make its way in our legislation (see also the list the oecd tracks of harmonizing all our draconian communist legislation)

Or the coincidence that now this gump also is a director of the wef.

How can he be the 2020 United Nations special envoy for climate action and finance;

2020 UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson appointed Carney to the position of finance advisor for the UK presidency of the COP26 United Nations Climate Change conference in Glasgow;

And with that resume not face a barrage of skepticism that he won't continue to punish Canada with the climate radical objective of mandatory degrowth.

Meanwhile the data the whole thing is a scam (my undergraduate was environmental science. I don't say that lightly) never gets explored.

Only juno news as put forth that his daughter is transgender.

Then the oecd legislation list permits GOVERNANCE not government.

Through ai social credit and constant monitoring brocken into our carbon measurement. No media addresses this inversion of democracy, from a rights based existence into an access based existence with any curiosity whatsoever.

The whole thing is clinched together through CBDC. AS IN CENTRAL BANK. OH A CENTRAL BANKER.

DID HE DECLARE if he is still part of the Bank of International settlement. Did he effectively avoid stating his conflict of interests with an early election?

All we see moving at scale is part of ccp culture and how they govern their citizens. But no interest in the influence the ccp has on the liberals and the evidence of the blatant corruption there either, or how the legislation that passes fits with social credit.

He is a carbon copy of Trudeau on so many ideological points. But he is also part of a non happenstance project that utterly inverts our world. Media is the ultimate tits on a bull. Tell me their pronouns so i can accommodate.

Expand full comment
Chantal's avatar

How does a bourgeois banker like Carney bear any resemblance to philosopher of the proletariat, Karl Marx?

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

The new equity is a climate carbon prison system with absolute state administration and control. Like all real communist eventualities, those with power advocating the full subjugation of the groveling righltess, speechless class. The smart city, the known on line and known and tracked in the real world is flawless perpwtual state power. Those not in compliance are ai social credit monitored and plucked from the system as non state compliant. Equity is the disguise, carbon is the ruse. Hevis here to mop the souls into cbdc. Our equality will be unmatched, right to caloric content.

Expand full comment
Chantal's avatar

You are describing authoritarianism not communism. Communism is about the withering away of the state and a classless society.

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Here it takes authority for all to be equal. Otherwise stratification occurs based on work ethic and ability. Punishing work and ability comes only from authority. There is no version of elimination of stratification that happens without force or cruelty.

Here is a video i prepared of the ultimate equity. The carbon prison . All the same Calories https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/the-global-control-matrix-15-minute

Expand full comment
Lawyerlisa's avatar

Haha. There is no history in your repertoire. Read the Black Book of Comminism.

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

So Justin didn’t resign?

Carney didn’t win the leadership?

Canadians aren’t impressed with a diverse and accomplished individual not peddling populism and zero to lightweight policies?

If the story is so juicy maybe you can convince a journalist you know to write it? Maybe you should?

Carny no doubt saw an obvious opening, who didn’t? There’s still an election to get through before this “takeover” is finished, does that count, or is it all part of the plan? You believe the supposed cabal knew Carney’s popularity would be so great, and Poilievre’s fall in the polls so rapid? Do these people speculate in the financial arena? Sounds like they should. Yes, I’m aware Carney was at Goldman, but didn’t read anything about supernatural prescience.

I think there’s a few wrinkles in your thesis, I look forward to hearing an explanation. TY.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

The absolute last thing canada needs is more of the same from the past ten years, which is what Carney represents.

Don’t tell me you believe he’s being truthful when he says he wants to build pipelines and useful energy projects?

That would be a complete repudiation of every word and action his has taken in the last decade.

He’s doing a Kamala, saying words to get elected 180 degrees out of step with his real beliefs.

Can fool some of the people all of the time.

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

Climate change is his only reason for being. He built everything around that. Why would he sabotage that? He's an ideologue not a pragmatist. He talks like a pragmatist but his past musings show he's a far left ideologue.

Being a banker provides the perfect cover for him. He can go up there and say he's going to build pipelines (which goes against his climate agenda as mentioned) and since he's a banker and an economist people will believe he's being 'pragmatic' about it. He's doing it to lure voters in because he knows it's a popular sentiment and it blunts the CPC's platform.

And once in, paf! Reverses everything. 'Things have changed' and 'we're in a crisis'.

It's called a 'bait switch'.

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

I don’t think the public narrative is any different than what actually happened. Where’s the mystery?

Carney may be cut from the same cloth as Freedland, but further removed from the Trudeau government. Carney is eminently qualified. Goldman Sachs isn’t a club easy to join, not to mention becoming the only foreigner to head the BOE.

You’re welcome to look for conspiracy whenever something you don’t agree with takes place, I see none here.

Poilievre is a life long backbencher with no bills or accomplishments in 20 years of public service.

Personally, I’d like to see the Conservatives have a chance at leadership just to balance the books, so to speak. I’m not suggesting the books will balance budget wise. It’s a nod to giving the other side a shot at showing what they can do.

Poilievre not revealing his platform early? Really?

How’d that workout? What was “Axe the Tax”?

It’s simple, unfortunately for Poilievre, Carney looks like a leader and speaks with a constructive and relatable tone. Pierre Poilievre, does not. No mystery.

At a news conference today Pierre just claimed the PC’s made a bunch of tax cuts under Harper, and balanced the budget. I liked Harper. Voted for him. He never managed to balance the budget.

You like a balanced budget?

How’s that square with tax cuts?

The Liberals had best not talk

balanced budgets. 😉

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

Poilievre introduced Bills C-383 and C-456.

And surviving federal politics for 20 years is an important accomplishment for a politician. Probably more important than spending 10 years with a 1,000 person staff to help make exactly 1 decision every month.

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

Fair enough. 🍻

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

Your point is well taken concerning Poilievre, though career politician could be said to come with its own limitations as far as navigating “the real world”.

Carney, on the other hand you portray as a caricature. Succeeding at Goldman Sachs is no mean feat, just getting hired is a significant accomplishment. That he was chosen to be the first non-Brit to head the Bank of England, one the most significant Sovereign financial institutions on the planet, cannot be overstated. It certainly isn’t recognized in your simplistic characterization.

The most important central banks by dollar volume on foreign exchange markets are:

U.S./EU/Japan/UK.

Will either of their resume’s be a factor? Maybe not, just how they resonate with voters.

For the record, I’m currently ambivalent on who should be the next PM. I will let the campaign inform my decision.

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

And he was under investigation for bullying and harassment allegations while he was head of the BoE as well as embroiled in a Forex scam scandal.

Choosing between a careerist like Poilievre and a central banker with a sketch background isn't the best scenario, but Poilievre comes with significantly less baggage.

Plus he actually lived here and served his constituents. Carney's an interloper who was installed through a sham process.

Just my 'peanut gallery' take.

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

This is a great interview describing Mark Carney's debt-slavery-carbon-credit-coup aided and abetted by public-private partnerships.

https://www.tftc.io/debt-slavery-carbon-credit-coup-whitney-webb/

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

My choice in the election might surprise you, I just wish there was substance coming from the PC side, and not echos of what worked Southside. Canadians aren’t impressed with jingos, and ever more wary of populism, for good reason in my view. Poilievre needs to step up and act like an adult, or he may lose my vote, not to mention a good number of Canadians with the same wish. In my opinion.

Now, what this post and my reply are about is an entirely different topic than what your comment addresses. If you have an opinion on the supposed unreported coup, I’d like to hear it.

All the best.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

So, you aren't curious at all that Carney was supposedly the thrust behind Trudeau planning to stick him in where Freeland sits, then it all blows up, they have a leadership "race" where Freeland fails to take a single shot at Carney, the guy who supposedly stabbed her in the back, then Carney wins with identical mid-80s support in ALL 338 ridings including Freeland's, after 60% of the supposed 400k liberal supporters are disqualified?

And there she is in the cabinet?

I would turn it back to what Peter is asking, and ask why you are so incurious?

As to Pierre, i'm sure he was as annoyed as i was with supposed "supporters" demanding he release his entire platform before an election is even called.

Expand full comment
Thorne Sutherland's avatar

Do you have a link that documents the disqualified votes? I saw something about it in a comment just after Carneys landslide. I’m curious as to why they were cancelled.

Expand full comment
Pat Robinson's avatar

I have no idea why they eliminated all those voters, probably weren’t going to vote for Carney.

The other highly suspect item is that Carney somehow got almost exactly the same percentage in all 338 ridings, ~85%, a statistical impossibility.

Including Freeland’s riding where she is popular, and Gould’s.

Funny how our “journalists” aren’t very curious about that?

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

Sheeesh. The shitshow with Danielle’s comments on Brietbart can’t help?? Just when you got the world by the tail, the world says otherwise. 🫣

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Mark Carney has been selected in a fixed system. He represents the private banks and not average Canadians. Pierre Pollievre is no better and neither will get my vote.

This is a great interview describing Mark Carney's debt-slavery-carbon-credit-coup aided and abetted by public-private partnerships.

https://www.tftc.io/debt-slavery-carbon-credit-coup-whitney-webb/

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

Elbows up!

And yet, Carney literally stole some of the CPC's plans. If he was just about slogans, why would he do that? What precisely is Carney proposing? Literally, he's farting in the wind with BS.

Poilievre's been putting out videos detailing what he plans to do. What more can he do? And quite frankly, I'd be wary given how the Liberals steal his platform gaslighting Canadians.

Expand full comment
Jerry Grant's avatar

If there is no substance from the CPC side, why are the Liberals stealing their policy ideas?

And the Liberal substance consists of abandoning everything they have done in the last 9+ years.

Expand full comment
Leslie Philipp's avatar

I’m undecided, for the record.

Having said that, I see no problem with either side promoting the same ideas, it’s inevitable anyway, considering they are addressing the same problems. As well, if you’re not happy with previous policies, you gotta like them being abandoned.

Let’s see how the campaign progresses.

Expand full comment
Johnny Dollar's avatar

Except this is not what's happening. What's happening is the Liberals are running away from their own record and pretending to have 'changed'. They were vehemently defending the carbon tax as recent as January. A tax Carney likely promoted behind the scenes and has repeatedly said he liked.

You seem to actually believe the Liberals are being genuine.

Expand full comment
Ruth B.'s avatar

Take heart, Peter. The Cdns who walked away from msm are paying attention. It’s not an insignificant number, otherwise msm wouldn’t be in such dire straits.

Expand full comment
Heidi Legg's avatar

Thank you for writing this, Peter and asking hard questions, as ever.

Expand full comment
Ken Laloge's avatar

This guy set up a $15 billion fund at Brookfield that operates on a carried interest model, meaning he gets a cut of the profits. The fund is invested in green energy projects—that Carney will make government policy.

Putting it in a blind trust doesn’t matter at this point if policies he enacts as prime minister increase his own wealth.

What am I missing here? “Look inside yourself”? Really?

Expand full comment
Rukhsana Sukhan's avatar

Kyle Kemper has recently wondered out loud in Xwitter about the influence of Bilderberg Group, which is reportedly how Carney got his appointed to the Bank of England. Freeland was a member in attendance at the 2023 meeting and not the 2024 meeting, Champagne was the cabinet member in attendance.

Expand full comment
JGP's avatar

Thanks Peter. Your well informed eyes on these slimeballs (I'm not sure if I mean the politicians or the journalists) is much appreciated.

Expand full comment
gary mitchell's avatar

The writing was on the wall, plain for all to see. I predicted this in December:

Freeland,Carney, Butts, Trudeau,and Singh all tied to the WEF.

Introduce Carney to Canadians by leaking that he might come in as Finance Minister.

Freeland resigns, Carney turns down the post, Trudeau prorogues Parliament, resigns just in time to elect Carney before Parliament resumes.

The Leadership race buries all of the Scandals, and puts a favourable spotlight on Carney.

If the polls go up... call an election quickly.

If the polls are still unfavorable, Singh was ready to rewrite a new deal to get the to October. If still no good in October claim an emergency to deal with Trump and gain another year.

Expand full comment
JGP's avatar

You're clearly not a journalist. You tell us things that are true and thoughtful. There is reason why politicians are thought of as moral scum, and journalist are thought of as lower than that. The real bottom rung below them are environmental grifters.

Expand full comment
rawrxiv's avatar

the real conceit here is that CdnPols is or ever has been intriguing.

Expand full comment
Bill MacGougan's avatar

Someone will pick it up eventually - if there’s a story there - hopefully, it’s interesting. We need some fresh and good Canadian non-fiction. Right now, I think folks are more interested in other things. Internal back-room party gossip is just not that tantalizing until someone uncovers a juicy something. At the moment those with wandering minds (or agendas) can speculate anything we want.

Expand full comment
Bud Sabiston's avatar

The complicit press, obsessed with the fk Trudeau mission, has had a hand in the current Liberal leadership. Meanwhile the US (and lapdogs) vultures who have been circling the carrion have now landed.

How,why the Conservative movement in Canada cannot muster up a viable candidate (through 3, maybe 4 elections) is a bigger concern. Watching PP flounder, lash out is an embarrassment, a complete failure by the party brain trust. Canadians are hungry for an adult in the room, all the slander and viscous attack dog tactics is last years news.

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Neither side of the fake 2-party paradigm is discussing the real issues.

Mark Carney's Brookfield Impact Investments stands to profoundly benefit from the Human Impact Bond Markets bolstered by his treasonous Covid-19 military operation which enabled the elimination of hundreds of thousands of Canadians from government pensions, payrolls and benefits thus, ERASING THOSE GOVERNMENT LIABILITIES and maximizing stakeholder profits while simultaneously injecting Canadians with nanotechnology biosensors for surveillance under the skin embedded in masks, tests and gene therapy jabs via the Internet of Bio-Nano Things and the WBAN (Wireless Body Area Network IEEE802.15.6 in the Terahertz Band) contrary to Sections 184(1) and 430(5) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

https://wrenchinthegears.com/2020/10/27/who-voted-in-davos-how-data-driven-government-and-the-internet-of-bodies-are-poised-to-transform-smart-sustainable-cities-into-social-impact-prisons/

https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/11/investigative-reports/un-backed-banker-alliance-announces-green-plan-to-transform-the-global-financial-system/

https://www.brookfield.com/news-insights/insights/brookfield-named-worlds-largest-impact-investor

Expand full comment